[Dear communists; I dare say that the following subject is the right completion to Marx's Manifesto ; that's why I would recommend a profound study to the subject which would refresh and strengthen the communism determination in the communists]

Vladimir Lenin inaugurated the founding congress of the third Communist International On March the 6th, 1919 and said.. " the victory of world communist revolution is assured ", and added .."The Russian proletariat have proved that they are more advanced and revolutionary than the proletariat in Germany and Britain", and concluded.. “The future of all peoples in the world will be determined here in Moscow by the Russian proletariat " – As Moscow by then became the centre of the world communist revolution. Thus Lenin read the Manifesto of Marx and Engels in 1919.

Was the reading of Lenin in 1919 to the Manifesto of Marx and Engels of 1848 true?

After a long century, common people after intellectuals and columnists in the world press unanimously say now that the reading of Lenin in 1919 to the Manifesto of Marx and Engels of 1848 wasn't true as all the peoples in the world had actually seen the collapse of Lenin's communist revolution itself in 1991.

Is this intellectuals' and columnists' new rejection to Lenin's assertions of 1919 true?

The petty bourgeoisie always incline by its nature to deny even the historical facts. Lenin didn't assure the victory of the communist revolution in accordance to what Marx and Engels had asserted in 1882 as saying.. “Today Russia forms the vanguard of revolutionary action in Europe " or, it was possible that .. "The Russian Revolution becomes the signal for a proletarian revolution in the West " . Though their sayings turned out to be strikingly accurate, but Lenin's assurances were due to the victory of the Russian proletariat against the Russian bourgeoisie and their allies, the landlords and the Tsarists, who waged in March 1918 a class war against the Bolsheviks under their notorious slogan “Death to the Bolsheviks“. The Russian proletariat smashed the bourgeoisie and their allies within that significant landmark year March 1918 to March 1919 . The Bolsheviks thereafter were to take care of the Soviet peoples and procure their subsistence and livelihood, but all of a sudden, the whole capitalist world, 14 countries, declared war on the B0lsheviks so as to "suffocate Bolshevism in its cradle" such as the British War Minister, W. Churchill declared his object . 19 armies well equipped and supplied by world imperialism were humiliatingly defeated and driven out of the Soviet territories by the Bolsheviks.

Eight years of continued wars 1914-1921 devastated the lands of the Soviet Union and impoverished the starving peoples . Just in 1922 only the Soviet state was able to look after the Soviet peoples . In 1926 the Gross National Production reached the level of 1913 before the war . During the ten years between 1928 and 1938 the Soviet economy multiplied by about 10 times ; and just by that, the Soviet Union became the most powerful state in the world . That exotic power was well demonstrated at Stalingrad and the soldiers of the Red Army in Berlin forcing their way into the bunker of Hitler and crushing his evil skull under their heavy boots - while in contrast Great Britain and United States remained altogether all the war time in confrontation with poor Italy only , 20 divisions of British and Americans against 30 divisions of Italians, while there were on the Eastern front 180 German advanced divisions against the Soviets.

The Soviet reconstruction campaign 1945-1950 confounded Gorbachev who wrote in his book (Perestroika) that Bolsheviks weren't probably human beings, and depicted the whole Soviet Union as similar as a beehive where the Soviets do not sleep day and night while reconstructing the war formidable destructions!

Was there anybody in the world in the early fifties of the last century who might have any suspicions about any perils threatening the safety of the Soviet Union?

No doubt that the intellectuals and the columnists who say now that Lenin's assertions of 1919 weren't true, they themselves would have assured the consistency and solidity of the Soviet Union in the early fifties .

Nobody would have any doubts about the future and consistency of the Soviet Union in the early fifties except Stalin, Stalin himself who expressed his fears about the fate of the communist revolution and the Soviet Union in different forms .

In the symposium held in 1951 to discuss the economic problems 0f socialism, Stalin spoke in an amicable tone about class struggle which is the engine of socialism wagon . That was against the criterion formulated by Stalin himself in 1938 which said .. " the more socialism proceed the more class struggle intensify " . In that symposium Stalin played the role of a conservative in opposition to Molotov the revolutionary .

In the 19th congress of the communist party in Nov.1952 Stalin appealed to the deputies not to re-elect the same aging members of the politburo including himself, because , as he explained, they wouldn't be able to bring about communism to the Soviet society due to aging and lack of energy . Deputies did not comply and re-elected them all, which prompted the disappointed Stalin to propose again that the deputies elect twelve members more so to have a politburo of 24 members consisting younger men enthusiastic to communism so to calm down the fearful worries about the future of the socialist revolution . Thus 12 younger men enthusiastic to communism were elected .

Thus Stalin expressed his fears about the consistency and the fate of the communist world revolution .

Those unexpected assertions of Stalin in Nov., 1952 provoked his old colleagues and made them worry about retire and deprival of any authority they had been used to for decades .

But why was Stalin haunted by such terrible fears on the fate of the Soviet Union and the communist revolution which Lenin had assured its victory 30 years ago ? That was only because of the Great War.

The self-devotion that the peoples in the Soviet Union incurred in the war against the savage Nazis was unimaginable . The Soviet proletariat formed naturally the dint of the resistance vanguard. The socialist transition achieved till then by the proletariat was consequently destroyed and the socialist forces diminished. That was in the end for the interests of the Soviet petty b0urgeoisie who were according to Lenin "the principal enemy of the Soviet socialism and proletariat" . The Soviet state, though presided by Stalin, the distinguished leader of the world proletariat, remained no more the State of the Proletariat dictatorship after that terrible war and the sacrifices entailed . The proletariat in the wars between 1918 – 1921 had had allies, the peasants and some other strata from the petty bourgeoisie itself, but the proletariat after the Great War didn't have any allies.

The drastic developments after the 19th congress of the party in October 1952 proved obviously that the Soviet petty bourgeoisie represented by the army were determined to reverse socialism.

Reversing socialism started, unconsciously probably, in the evening of 28th February 1953 where, according to V. Molotov, three of the members of the politburo, Beria, Malenkov and Khrushchev poisoned Stalin to die on 5th March. on 6th March in the morning, before the funeral of Stalin to grave the aging members of the politburo met to revoke the membership of the new members in the politburo who were actually their parallels and substitutes . Those aging members whom Stalin had proposed to be ousted from the party leadership knew very well that they had no right to revoke the membership of the politburo except after a court conviction which they never had .

Six months later, in September 53, Khrushchev and collaborators in the politburo summoned the central committee in order to annul the fifth 5-year plan and divert its allocated money to weapons production, despite the members of the central committee being aware that they had been elected to implement every resolution taken by the party congress but not to annul it . It's very difficult to think that the majority of the politburo as well as the central committee did not know that that decision was not imposed on the party by army chieftains, the vanguard and leaders of Soviet petty bourgeoisie, and that wasn't an Escape from Due Socialism . The resignation of Malenkov from the party general secretary wasn't enough to denounce the annulment of the 5-year plan which was according to Stalin's planning to secure unparalleled welfare to the Soviet peoples and restore the dictatorship of the proletariat which was the main concern of Stalin after it had been eroded through the Great War .

In February 1956, after the twentieth congress had finished its works, Khrushchev proceeded to the committee in concern, presided by him, requesting an additional session. The committee agreed unaware of the subject implied which was its fatal sin . The deputies therein were amazingly confounded by a furious unjustified attack on Stalin that implied at the same time an open denunciation to socialism built then by Stalin who was still the sacred icon not to the Soviets only but to all progressive forces in the world . It didn't work that Khrushchev confessed in his inauguration address to 21st congress of the communist party in Feb. 1959 that all the conquests and social advancement being fulfilled in the Soviet Union during the leadership of Stalin, or his confession to the Algerian president Bin Bella in 1964 in Crimea that he felt remorse for attacking Stalin.

The next year, in June 1957, the politburo withdrew confidence from Khrushchev and thus he ought to evacuate his two positions, the general secretary of the communist party and state prime minister . On the contrary, he appealed to his friend, defense minister, Marshall Gorgy Zhukov, who was the head of militarism that imposed the dispensation of light industry for weapons industry, Zhukov didn't delay, he plotted a semi-military coup against the party and fired out seven Bolshevik members, who had withdrawn confidence, from the politburo keeping three non Bolsheviks only!!

The heresies uttered by Khrushchev in the 21st and 22nd congresses of 1959 and 1961 respectively were the final proof that the Soviet petty bourgeoisie had started an Escape from the Due Socialism since September 1953 even without the military coup d'état that toppled Khrushchev himself in 1964 . The Escape was acknowledged in 1991 only . It was an Escape from the Due Socialism, but Escape to where ? To nowhere !! Weapons do not make social system, they are exactly the "nowhere" .

2
The assertions of Lenin in March 1919 meant that the main contradiction in the world system had got to be between socialism and capitalism, between the world proletariat and the multicolor bourgeoisie, led by the capitalists. Now those who still discredit and deny the assertions of Lenin, they wouldn't have any credibility unless they propose a different contradiction in the world system, or else allege its stability and consistency, or even its eternity!!

The most indicative token to the acute contradiction between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie was that although the Bolsheviks had seized power in Russia in October 1917 to correct the deviation of the track of the Bourgeois Revolution in Feb.1917, that's to help the bourgeoisie to achieve its revolution, and not to implement socialism, yet the bourgeoisie declared war against the Bolsheviks ; and when they lost the war, all the capitalists in the world equipped 19 armies and sent them to Russia to "suffocate bolshevism in its cradle". 19 well equipped armies by 14 imperialist countries were humiliatingly defeated by the Bolsheviks after which the capitalists all-over the world got convinced that there would be no probability to vanquish the Bolsheviks. The remaining prospect to capitalism was only the Escape from the Due Socialism. That's why the British intelligence, which became thereafter the sole mastermind of world imperialism, cut off the road to communists in Italy and manipulated the Fascist March On Rome in Nov. 1922 and enabled Mussolini to seize power in collaboration with king Emanuel though Fascists had no power in the parliament . The British intelligence built Fascism in Italy as a wall to repel communism outside the Soviet Union . The next evil repel wall the British intelligence had built was Nazism of Hitler in Germany.

Those repel walls could not secure a safe Escape for capitalism as expected, they were swept away by the stormy communism in WWII. The stormy communism in 1945 launched the winds of freedom all through the world . All the peripheral countries revolted demanding the full independence and the cutoff of the connections to the metropolises. All the peripheral countries that had been the sole outlet to the surplus production in the metropolises succeeded to obtain their independence by the World National Revolution 1946-1972 and eventually ceased to absorb any surplus production in the metropolises. By then the vision of Karl Marx was realized and capitalism was suffocated sunk in its surplus production . Capitalism collapse was the essential permission to the transition to Socialism.

As capitalists failed to repel communism and secure the safe Escape from Due Socialism, and declined in the meantime to be degraded to commons' or workers' level, they scraped harshly their bourgeois minds to find an exit. The first summit conference of the Great Five (G 5) held in Rambouillet / Paris on 16th Nov., 1975, invented a predatory and allusive exit that transfers the "value" from merchandise to money which is contrary to the basic rules and principles of any economy . Their predatory decision to withdraw their currencies out of exchange markets meant right here that the "value" is originated fundamentally in money, not in merchandise. They invented that ridiculous sham for they, the rich five, had already had the largest pools of money in Euro Dollar and Petro Dollar. That predatory rule proved to be false and against mankind . The price of an ounce of gold was in 1970 about $70 but it came to be in 1910 about $1400 ; that was because the gold is a merchandise and money in fact isn't . Money (except metallic) does not store any considerable amount of human labor .

Founders of economics, Smith, Ricardo and Marx, all say that the "value" is the human labor power materialized in a merchandise . The Russian petty bourgeoisie denied this scientific rule to say that the value resides mainly in weapons which aren't merchandises that meet man live needs ; and the capitalists denied that golden rule and said the value resides originally in money . The denial of both parties is laughable; those who are determined to escape from the Due socialism lose their minds at escape. Our uneatable conclusion here is that the whole world since the fifties of last century does economically and politically work without any rules and laws at all . It's in Escape of Due Socialism and escape cannot be governed by any rules except anarchy.

Anarchy now shall continue dominating everywhere before socialism. Nothing else except anarchy that allows the petty bourgeoisie to consume the biggest lot of national production without producing a farthing.

The Escape from Due Socialism is exclusively possible by abandonment of merchandise production as this mode of production produces the grave diggers of capitalism and bourgeoisie . There's no doubt that the abandonment of merchandise production is an effective procedure against socialism, and provide a convenient Escape ; but this specific procedure goes on against human life as man had started the alienation in a humanitarian historic journey by producing material products that keep his life and protect him from extinction . Thus, the continuous decrease in merchandise production would bring back mankind to the risks of extinction which it would resist by every remaining potential . At this situation, the petty bourgeoisie, which is the sole opponent to merchandise production, would crumble down as a coherent social class and become at last historically extinct.

At that situation there wouldn't remain in every developing society any social cohering class except the proletariat who are the merchandise producers as the society cannot do away with subsistent "commodities" . When all the enemies of the proletariat extinct the democratic proletariat seize power and form their democratic non-dictatorial state which is much different from the state of the proletariat dictatorship which was according to Marx the general condition for a successful transition to socialism preparatory period . Just by dictatorship the proletariat would be able to rub out the other coexistent classes so to have a communist society without any classes even the proletarian class itself . After the disintegration of the petty bourgeois class and its historical extinction as a coherent social class, the ailing proletariat would find itself the only remaining class that falls upon her the whole society revival by transforming all the available labor power into material subsistence supporting human life.

In the Communist Manifesto (1848) Marx and Engels had warned the communists from the reactionary petty bourgeoisie "lower middle class" even while they struggle against the capitalists as they struggle against their conversion to proletariat. And Lenin also described the petty bourgeoisie in 1922 as "the principal enemy to the proletariat and socialism" . The Soviet petty bourgeoisie assisted by the Hitlerism aggression succeeded to overturn the Leninist communist revolution in the fifties, but they couldn’t do away with the main contradiction between the petty bourgeoisie and the proletariat . they brought forth the anarchy and maltreated all the resources of Russia that returned backward to be categorized as a developing country while it was seventy years ago the most powerful state in the world .

The main acting contradiction in the Soviet socialism between the petty bourgeoisie and the proletariat did not come to an end, as Marx and Lenin had anticipated, due to the extraordinary circumstances that prevailed there especially the war against Nazism. That main contradiction was not resolved by a proletarian revolution due to the treachery of the Soviet communist party led by Khrushchev but the temporarily victorious petty bourgeoisie would not be able to stop the waning of the contradiction because they do not produce the livelihood of mankind.

The petty bourgeoisie cannot escape finally from the due socialism for they cannot establish a stable production system by services in the ex-capitalist west or weapons in the ex-socialist east . Hence the reading of Lenin in 1919 to the Communist Manifesto of Marx and Engels of 1848 is still correct.

Drop a comment

Full Name

Your Email

Country

Message

Thank you.
We received your comment, it will be published soon under the writer's article